- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 11:14:21 +0100
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
At 02:48 PM 7/17/02 -0700, Seth Russell wrote: >Well I for one studied the tradeoff carefully (see graph below) and came to >the conclusion that I could write a engine that would make the correct >entailments for all the cases unless the WG made some really off the wall >decision. I also came to the conclusion that I would want the answers to >Tests A and Tests D both to be 'yes'. I held a similar view until Brian raised the question of what to do with rdf:_1, etc. See recent exchange between Brian and Drew McDermott. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Sunday, 21 July 2002 06:05:33 UTC