W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

Comments on RDF/XML Test Cases

From: Daniel 'eikeon' Krech <eikeon@eikeon.com>
Date: 07 Jul 2002 14:15:21 -0400
To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <u65zr2yme.fsf@eikeon.com>

The following is a summary of my comments on the RDF/XML test cases:
   (see http://rdflib.net/2002/07/07/rdfxml.html for html version)


   The expected output contains the following triple:

     <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf#e4> <http://foo/bar> "foobar".

   where RDFLib is getting:

     _:a6 <http://foo/bar> "foobar".

   Best I can tell, the triple should be the result of an empty
   property element.  In which case, the subject comes from the r in
   the otherwise section and since there is no rdf:resource attribute,
   r should be a BNode.


   This test case is not working for the same reason as test004 above.


   Is rdf:aboutEach allowed as an attribute here? This test case fails
   since the parser reports the invalid property attribute of


   Is rdf:Description allowed as a property element name? This test
   case fails since the parser reports the invalid property element


   Is there some reason why the list expansion rules do not apply in
   this case? This test case fails since the list expansion rules as
   specified in section 5.8 are being applied.


   Is rdf:Description really allowed as a property attribute name?
   This test case fails since the parser is reporting an the invalid
   property attribute name.


   It appears that the xml:base in the expected output does not match
   the actually xml:base as it is missing an "xmlbase/".

--eikeon, http://eikeon.com/
Received on Sunday, 7 July 2002 14:15:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:00 UTC