- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 06:44:17 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Comments from Ivan Herman in IRC. I've forgotten details of MT to be able to answer this myself, but there may at least be a readability / presentation issue here. Dan <ivan> Hi Dan. I am reading the RDF Model document (...) and I found an irritating editorial problem (I think it is editorial). <ivan> On the one hand it defines the interpretation with (among others) defining the IS function. So far so good. <ivan> However, starting around section 3.1, my impression is that it uses 'I' instead of 'IS' all the time. For example, it says 'I(rdf:type)', whereas, unless I misunderstand something, this should be 'IS(rdf:type)'. This is not only at one place. <ivan> Do I grossly misunderstand something? <ivan> (I guess my mathematical subconscious mind which resurfaces...) <danbri> I'm not sure, without studying it. My mathematical subconscious has never surfaced. ... <danbri> Can you mail me something, or is the irc above ok? <ivan> yep, the IRC is o.k. <ivan> Thx
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 06:44:17 UTC