W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:48:58 -0600
To: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
CC: "'www-rdf-comments@w3.org'" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B8B3C5DA.276AE%me@aaronsw.com>
On 2002-03-12 2:22 PM, "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net> wrote:

> ... I don't want to jump into this controversy.  But what is the use of
> warning the public to be cautious without providing them the knowledge of
> how to avoid the danger?  In other words:  Where will it hurt?   Without
> presenting this knowledge, I fear, that the warning will do more harm than
> good.

Avoiding it is obvious: don't use fragments. Explaining where it will hurt
is more difficult, especially to get consensus on the wording.

[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 15:49:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:59 UTC