- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:06:41 +0000
- To: "stephen machin" <sjmachin@hotmail.com> (by way of "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>), www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Cc: eric miller <em@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
At 09:18 08/03/2002 -0500, stephen machin wrote: [...] >it's a damn shame >the revision is not referenced from the original >http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax >that would have saved me 2 days work We have an action to update the M&S document errata with a reference to the documents that are planned to update it. This may be the best we can do, since we have restructured the documents and the new documents are not straight replacements for the existing one, nor are they normative since they have not yet completed the W3C process. I will however ask for advice from a W3C process guru on how best to point folks to the work in progress. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 12:08:47 UTC