- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:24:03 +0000
- To: timbl@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Tim,
In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0172.html
you raised an issue which was captured in
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xmllang
as
[[[
"This is a mess - it is in the syntax and not in the model. Should have
used an RDF vocabulary for language. It should be removed from the syntax."
]]]
As recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002-02-26-1
the RDFCore WG has resolved:
[[
a literal consists of three components:
o A representation of the parseType, which is a single bit
o A language indicator which is a string as defined in XML
o A fully normalized UNICODE string.
]]
Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.
Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:25:53 UTC