- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:16:54 +0000
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: "me" <me@aaronsw.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, "www-rdf-comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
At 13:36 23/02/2002 -0500, Jonathan Borden wrote: >Dan Brickley wrote: [...] >Yes. There is no need for the RDF community to concern itself with >"subresources". That is to say, the notion of "subresource" is encompased by >the RDF usage of the term "resource". I am thinking that the term >"subresource" is itself misleading, +1 Brian
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:54:14 UTC