- From: Bill de hÓra <bdehora@interx.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:29:24 -0000
- To: "'Brian McBride'" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It's acceptable to me. Bill de hÓra > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com] > Sent: 18 February 2002 15:54 > To: dehora@acm.org > Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org > Subject: RDF Issue rdf-terminologicus > > > Bill, > > In > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Dec/0152. > html > > you raised an issue which was captured in > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-terminologicus as [[[ Communication and discussion within the community interested in RDF is hampered by lack of a disciplined terminology. It is suggested that a glossary of terms be developed to aid effective communication. This is a general issue for all RDF specifications. ]]] As recorded in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html the RDFCore WG resolved: the WG resolves that this issue is addressed by the primer and that this issue be closed. Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPHIo/uaWiFwg2CH4EQIOzwCgvqDyflAs69yL6mbfNugMAtLS9RYAoPkO JSDwC7sF9MlL2xMZU713gi7I =+hno -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 05:42:20 UTC