- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:59:22 +0000
- To: Roland Schwaenzl <Roland.Schwaenzl@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
- cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
>>>Roland Schwaenzl said: > > Dave Beckett wrote: > > > However, the interpretation of the syntax may change - especially > > for rdf:value, since that was rather vaguely defined (by example only) in > > the RDF Model & Syntax document. > > rdf:value is typed as a property and given meaning in > http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# > > Do you indicate it will be given substantially different semantics? No, I'm saying that the RDF M&S document gives it no explicit meaning. I expect that some RDF Core WG documents will fix this. The words in the comment in the RDF schema at the above URI are not the same thing. I expect any revised RDF schema for the above namespace URI would be substantially the same (only typographic, documentation or syntax tweaks). Dave
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 05:59:25 UTC