- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:34:02 +0200
- To: ext Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On 2002-01-29 15:47, "ext Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net> wrote:
>> I'm presuming it is http://example.org/foo-schema-ns#bongo, right?
>
> No, see it is more complicated. ...
>
> so the URI would be:
>
> http://example.com/XSD.xsd#foo
>
> entirely different that what you suspected!
>
> ...
>
> The problem is way deeper than '#'
>
> ... use the _predefined_ URIs, and those alone,
Insofar as XML Schema datatypes are concerned (or datatypes in
general) I see no major problem with only using URIs and
avoiding qnames when referencing datatypes in RDF.
Whether we ever will be able to use qnames across standards
such as XML Schema and RDF will then remain to be determined.
OK?
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2002 08:33:01 UTC