- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 08:12:39 +0100 (BST)
- To: Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w3.org>
- cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, phayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, www-rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Massimo Marchiori wrote: > > The preamble to the test case descriptions _does_ say that all test > > case results should be interpreted by a person (ie, that we're not into > > exhaustive conformance testing). > Blub.... you mean the test:description? > This awfully reminds me of the rdfs:comment recent thread... > What's the normative value of an rdf:description inside a test case? > If instead it's in the main text, I am not sure about the reference. The file containing these (the manifest file) is referred to normatively from the spec. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk stty intr ^m
Received on Saturday, 1 June 2002 14:32:15 UTC