- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:26:14 -0400
- To: danbri@w3.org
- Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org, em@w3.org, w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org
From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> Subject: Re: need to determine what RDF is Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:21:36 -0400 (EDT) > > My take in a nutshell. The core problem (our 'rdfms-assertion' issue, on > my reading) > > RDFCore 1.0 RDF/XML documents have propositional content; they represent > 'claims about the world'. What factors fix this content, ie. what > is relevant when we set about considering whether some bundle of these > RDF/XML-represented propositions are true or not? > > I don't think there is a simple answer. I wish there were... > > Dan Hmm, this is not really what I was getting at, as it includes lots of issues about the relationship between RDF graphs and the real world. I'm only interested in relationships between RDF graphs. Which such relationships are RDF relationships? My view is that the only such relationships are RDF entailment and RDFS entailment. Any agent that computes any other relationship between RDF graphs is not doing RDF. (Well, actually, I suppose that an agent could be determining whether two RDF graphs RDF entail each other, which is different from RDF entailment, but I think that you should be able to get my drift.) peter
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 11:27:12 UTC