- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:51:07 +0100
- To: "J. Imlay" <jimlay@u.washington.edu> (by way of "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>), www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Josie, We've checked this out and it looks right to us. What exactly are the errors you are getting, from what tools and what do you think it should say? Brian At 08:14 01/03/2002 -0500, J. Imlay wrote: >[stuck in spam trap -rrs] > >Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:53:06 -0500 (EST) >From: "J. Imlay" <jimlay@u.washington.edu> >To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org >Message-ID: ><Pine.A41.4.44.0202151448410.82754-100000@dante28.u.washington.edu> >Why is there no ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> or something like this at the >top of the rdf-schema? > >The one I am using is at 'http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema' and the >scenario is that I am creating a large rdf model with lots of schemas so >that I can process them as tripples. The problem is that my program is >working for all the other rdf schemas I have found except this one. Here I >get unicode errors because of lack of an encoding definition. > >Thank you, > >Josie Imlay ><http://josie.atypedigital.com>
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 04:53:38 UTC