- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:37:10 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote: > > Dan, > > In > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0128.html > > you raised an issue with the RDF Schema specification whic was recorded in > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-constraint-properties-resources > > as > > Are constraint properties and contraint resources useful. If not, then > eliminate them. > > On 9th November 2001, the RDFCore WG resolved: > > The current mechanism, rdfs:ConstraintResource and > rdfs:ConstraintProperty, fails to serve its original purpose and > should be removed from the RDF Schema 1.0 specification. The > accompanying text be amended accordingly. > > Please could you reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, > indicating whether this decision satisfactorily resolves the issue. I'm satisfied with the decision to remove them. I wonder what "its original purpose" refers to. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 10:38:53 UTC