- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:36:01 -0400
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
I'm looking on the issues list and not finding this. Sorry if I'm just missing it. In http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/ section 3.2.1 is the example ================ The model for the sentence The students in course 6.001 are Amy, Tim, John, Mary, and Sue. is written in RDF/XML as <rdf:RDF> <rdf:Description about="http://mycollege.edu/courses/6.001"> <s:students> <rdf:Bag> <rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/Amy"/> <rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/Tim"/> <rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/John"/> <rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/Mary"/> <rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/Sue"/> </rdf:Bag> </s:students> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> ================ which seems to be saying that Amy is her web page. Even if she doesn't have a web page, RFC 2616 says that HTTP URIs denote "network data objects or services" (not people). This came to my attention in Larry Masinter's duri/tbd draft [1], which points to this excerpt and says "RDF ... may already provide for the 'thing described by' indirection." And it may: if the s:students relation is between the web page for a course and a bag of the web pages of the students in the course, then the example works. Without a schema for s:students we can't really tell. Presumably, the schema would tell us whether s:students was supposed to relate a course to a bag of students, or a web page to a bag of web pages. -- sandro [1] http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-masinter-dated-uri-00.txt
Received on Friday, 31 August 2001 11:36:02 UTC