- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:36:01 -0400
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
I'm looking on the issues list and not finding this. Sorry if I'm
just missing it.
In http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/ section 3.2.1 is the example
================
The model for the sentence
The students in course 6.001 are Amy, Tim, John, Mary, and Sue.
is written in RDF/XML as
<rdf:RDF>
<rdf:Description about="http://mycollege.edu/courses/6.001">
<s:students>
<rdf:Bag>
<rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/Amy"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/Tim"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/John"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/Mary"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://mycollege.edu/students/Sue"/>
</rdf:Bag>
</s:students>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
================
which seems to be saying that Amy is her web page. Even if she
doesn't have a web page, RFC 2616 says that HTTP URIs denote "network
data objects or services" (not people).
This came to my attention in Larry Masinter's duri/tbd draft [1],
which points to this excerpt and says "RDF ... may already provide for
the 'thing described by' indirection."
And it may: if the s:students relation is between the web page for a
course and a bag of the web pages of the students in the course, then
the example works. Without a schema for s:students we can't really
tell. Presumably, the schema would tell us whether s:students was
supposed to relate a course to a bag of students, or a web page to a
bag of web pages.
-- sandro
[1] http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-masinter-dated-uri-00.txt
Received on Friday, 31 August 2001 11:36:02 UTC