Re: QName URI Scheme Re-Visited, Revised, and Revealing

On Monday, August 27, 2001, at 03:43  AM, wrote:

> Fair enough. But they are still then limited to URIs which allow
> direct partitioning into QNames. I.e. they can't use URIs with
> bracketing syntax.

I think you're beating a dead horse here. I agree with this, you 
agree with this, Dan Connolly agrees with this, and it's on the 
RDF issues list. What more do you want?

[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <> ; <> ]

Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 09:36:13 UTC