- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:52:17 -0500
- To: puninj@cs.rpi.edu
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:18:42PM -0500, puninj@cs.rpi.edu wrote: > I think these are two errors that I found in Sirpac: > > The first example produces this triple: > (online:#genid5, http://www.foo.org/foo-ns#value, 6) > > The second example produces this triple: > (online:#genid5, value, 6) > > where the "value" property does not belong to > the namespace: http://www.foo.org/foo-ns# John - it does seem like the value of these two properties should be the same. However, which one is "correct" is not clear as the following thread indicates: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Mar/0207.html I agree with Lee Jonas' sentiment in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Mar/0246.html that the M&S spec needs to address this issue. The issue: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion is related but does not explicitly cover this issue. Anyhow, I added this as MAR-28-2001-1 to: http://www.w3.org/RDF/Implementations/SiRPAC/SiRPAC-defects.html > 2) This example produces the following triples: > > I think the object of the triples should be: > > online:#n1 instead of online:##n1, and > online:#n2 instead of online:##n2 The servlet chooses to use "online:#" as the document's base [if Parse RDF is selected]. Perhaps it should not use anything or use "online:" but it is consistent. Art ---
Received on Friday, 30 March 2001 08:52:18 UTC