- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:18:40 -0500
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Cc: RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for the bug reports Aaron. I have filed them as
FEB-21-2001-{1-7} at:
http://www.w3.org/RDF/Implementations/SiRPAC/SiRPAC-defects.html
A few comments below.
Art
---
> <rdf:RDF
> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> xmlns:a="http://www.example.org/"
> >
> <rdf:Description>
> <a:creator rdf:resource="lala">text</a:creator>
> </rdf:Description>
> </rdf:RDF>
The above appears to be illegal RDF - a propertyElt may only have content
if it has an ID and/or parseType attribute. However, SiRPAC doesn't
throw an error so I filed this as FEB-21-2001-4.
> SiRPAC should probably complain if an li is used out of context:
>
> <rdf:RDF
> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> xmlns:a="http://www.example.org/"
> >
> <rdf:Description>
> <rdf:li>a</rdf:li>
> </rdf:Description>
> </rdf:RDF>
Yes a warning would be a good idea but it's certainly legal
according to the spec. I believe the container doc by Brian and
Dave address this issue but I get a Not Found error when I try to
access their doc:
http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/bwm/rdf/issues/containersyntax/proposal
as documented in:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/
Received on Sunday, 25 February 2001 11:18:54 UTC