- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:05:55 -0600
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, sandro@w3.org, www-rdf-logic@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
>pat hayes wrote: >[...] > > This is supposed to be saying that a string has something as its > > linguistic 'value', but the value comes first. In other words, it's > > saying that the string is a NAME for the thing. So how about > > rdf:nameIs, or (since this is being used with an equality sign which > > conveys the 'is' already) rdf:nameOf or rdf:nameFor ? > >The closest W3C-Recommended precedent I can think of >is rdfs:label; is that close enough? > >i.e. traditional-kr:Thing is to rdf:Resource >as traditional-kr:Name is to rdfs:label. > >Perhaps it's best to exploit that precedent, >but make a new name for this specialized use: > > :lexRep a daml:UnambiguousProperty; > rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label; > rdfs:domain xsd:anySimpleType; > rdfs:range xsd:string. That seems OK. I kind of dislike having to switch from use to mention every time I see 'lexRep', but I guess I'm going to have to get used to this. Pat --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2001 12:04:25 UTC