[not copied to the WG...] Aaron Swartz wrote: > > Re: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Apr/0047.html > > > [[ > > All elements and attributes in RDF must be namespace qualified > > ]] > > What is the reasoning for "all elements" being part of this requirement? Because that's the way it's always been; no change is suggested regarding elements, I don't think. > Many current RDF documents use default namespaces properly to default > elements. Right; such elements are namespace qualified. > Is there a reason for disqualifying this practice? No, using the default namespace on elements is fine. Just note that there *is* *no* default namespace for attributes; so you need a colon in them every time. Getting exactly the right wording for issues like this is practially impossible; no matter what words you choose, somebody gets confused. We really need examples/test cases. I'm in the middle of something else just now... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 12:18:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:55 UTC