- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@netscape.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 10:54:25 -0700
- To: Samuel Yang <syang@peoplemoverinc.com>
- CC: "'www-rdf-comments@w3.org'" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "'rdf-dev@mailbase.ac.uk'" <rdf-dev@mailbase.ac.uk>
I believe it should add a duplicate. Samuel Yang wrote: > I'm sending this query out again to a wider audience... Anybody have an > answer? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Samuel Yang [mailto:syang@peoplemoverinc.com] > Sent: Friday, April 02, 1999 12:31 PM > To: 'www-rdf-comments@w3.org' > Subject: Are duplicate property/value pairs permitted for a resource? > > If an RDF processor is asked to add a property/value pair for a resource, > but that property/value pair already exists for that resource, should the > processor: > > (a) Add a duplicate property/value pair to the resource, or > (b) Ignore the "new" property/value pair? > > I couldn't find anything in the spec regarding this issue. The closest > thing I found had to do with fact that the Bag and Seq containers allow > multiple instances of the same value. However, that isn't even the same > issue, since items within a collection have unique property names (rdf:_1, > rdf:_2, etc.) > > Samuel C. Yang > syang@peoplemoverinc.com > <<Samuel C. Yang.vcf>>
Received on Thursday, 8 April 1999 13:55:35 UTC