- From: Roger L. Costello <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 07:42:58 -0400
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, costello@mitre.org
Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> Having an rdf:type property pointing to rdf:Bag is just RDF's way of
> telling us that the anonymous resource "is A" rdf:Bag.
>
Is it *always* the case that if an RDF model has a resource with a
property rdf:type whose value is foo then rather than:
<rdf:Description [attrs]>
<rdf:type resoure="foo">
[other properties]
</rdf:Description>
the syntax is:
<foo>
[other properties]
</foo>
Example:
Rather than:
<rdf:Description >
<rdf:type resoure="rdf:Bag">
[other properties]
</rdf:Description>
the syntax is:
<rdf:Bag>
[other properties]
</rdf:Bag>
/Roger
Received on Thursday, 8 April 1999 07:41:46 UTC