- From: Anand C. Patel <acpatel@usa.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 13:14:45 GMT
- To: swick@w3.org, jsaarela@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
I posted this question earlier, but haven't heard back from anyone, and am sending this partly to ask again, and partly to see if anyone is there, or if you are all on vacation. ;) Now another question about RDF. RDF allows one to create relational data models via the schema mechanism, and lets one make instantiations of those models via the RDF syntax, correct? Why would you use this extremely powerful tool only for metadata, and not data in general? It seems better than any of the other data in XML specs out there, and seems rather general purpose. One idea I was throwing around is using RDF as a sort of interchange format for databases -- medical data comes from a variety of incongruous legacy databases, and we're working on a new format for unifying medical data. Why not make it easier to go from one form to another by creating an RDF application that would serve as an interchange layer between data formats that had been represented as peers in RDF? Thanks, Anand C. Patel acpatel@usa.net LCS, MGH, Boston MA, USA
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 1998 09:09:44 UTC