- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:41:08 -0500
- To: RDF Calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
FYI... "A week or so ago, I started working with the X2V code, which works great but has a lot of redundancy. In order to have some confidence that I wouldn't break it, I developed a test case for each piece of the code that I touched. ..." -- hcardTest materials, XHTML version of RFC2426, and fun with microformats http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-dev/2005-July/000010.html While I was at it, I adapted the techniques from my derived version of xhtml2vcard.xsl to consume hCalendar... http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2001/palmagent/toICal.xsl 1.1, Sat Jul 23 19:39:07 2005 It doesn't cover the iCalendar spec in nearly as much detail as http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/fromIcal.py (no specific code for repeating events, timezones, or any of that). It should be straightforward to get it to produce RDF, i.e. to be a GRDDL transformation for hCalendar. Then all we'd need is an XMDP profile for hCalendar, which the microformats folks seem to agree is in order... [[ Would it be more in the spirit of HTML to define these classes in a metadata profile (http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.4.4.3), so that "User agents may... perform some activity based on known conventions for that profile"? Should this be a part of microformats specifications in general? (If not, why not?) * ACCEPTED. Yes, all microformats that introduce new classnames SHOULD include an XMDP (http://gmpg.org/xmdp/) profile (which itself is a microformat for defining HTML metadata profiles) that defines those classnames. ]] -- http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar-issues and we'd have all the hCalendar data connected to the upper-case Semantic Web. :) -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 25 July 2005 21:41:21 UTC