- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:14:34 -0500
- To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
I'm travelling to Switzerland in October for a TAG meeting, and the W3C travel folks gave me 3 itineraries to evaluate. I got all three itineraries converted to .ics format and loaded into Apple iCal; I'm not sure it got the timezones right. I consider much of the data sensitive just now, but you can see the makefile where I made .ics versions of the itineraries... http://www.w3.org/2004/10dc-bsl/Makefile Ah what the heck... I'll make the screenshot world-readable: http://www.w3.org/2004/10dc-bsl/eval-3-cals.png Generating the .ics versions of the itineraries involved updating toIcal.py w.r.t the timezone design that uses timezones as properties. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/toIcal.py Revision 2.21 2004/09/08 15:46:05 a new dateTime/timezone design, with datatypes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2004Apr/0022.html Hmm... re-reading that message, I see that it talks about using timezones as datatypes. I'm not actually doing that; rather, I'm using them as http://esw.w3.org/topic/InterpretationProperties They're analagous, but not quite the same thing. Sorry this is all jumbled up... today's task was to make travel arrangements, not to write code. I hope to explain more later... perhaps to update http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfCalendarTimeZoneNotes -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2004 17:14:22 UTC