- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:35:25 -0500
- To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 15:34:41 UTC
I'm starting to feel like I haven't made good on the "if anybody objects, we'll roll back the changes" promise. http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/#dev I wonder if I should roll back the timezone changes and start a new schema with the new timezone design. I'm not inclined to maintain 2 schemas. I'm willing to move new development to schema with a URI different from http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical but I'm not offering to do maintenance on that one as well as new development. The tests and conversion tools will migrate to the new schema, I think; I don't think I can afford to keep 2 sets of them around. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 15:34:41 UTC