- From: Paul Cowles <paul@semaview.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:03:10 -0500
- To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Upon first inspection, this schema looks like a nice progression. When you say "leaning toward replacing http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical.rdf", I am making the assumption that the new schema will have its own URI and we can cut over to the new schema as our release schedule permits. We'll be able to take a closer look shortly and will follow-up with more feedback. Paul -----Original Message----- From: www-rdf-calendar-request@w3.org [mailto:www-rdf-calendar-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:31 PM To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org Subject: deriving the schema from the iCalendar RFC [was: XHTML version of RFC 2445] OK, so I now have a schema that's starting to be pretty useful... http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2445-formal.rdf It has pretty good domain/range info on all icalendar properties. I've checked the properties that occur in the first few test data files pretty thoroughly, and I'm convinced the rest are right. I'd like somebody to review and confirm. I'm leaning toward replacing http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical.rdf with that content, once I get a couple things done: -- base URI issues -- connecting it to the test data somehow I'm thinking about using http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/util/validate.n3 to connect the data to the schema... or an OWL DL checker like pellet... or something... I'll let you know when I've got it working. Meanwhile... who agrees that this schema is better? On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 03:02, Dan Connolly wrote: > I produced an XHTML-happy version of the iCalendar RFC: > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2445 > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2445.html > > It has TOC navigation, so you can cite section 4.4 directly: > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2445#sec4.4 > > I'm sure this has been done before, but my motivation is to extract > schema information out of the RFC, and XHTML sorta came out as a > debugging byproduct as my code was digesting the spec... > > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/slurpIcalSpec.py > v 1.1 2004/01/28 08:54:24 > > Share and Enjoy. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the W3C Tech Plenary in Cannes 1-5 Mar 2003?
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2004 11:17:06 UTC