- From: Ryan Lee <ryanlee@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:52:29 -0500 (EST)
- To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- cc: <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Agenda request: Going from RDF to iCal. Dan Connolly and/or I will be working on http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/toIcal.py which is cwm-based, or maybe an XSLT version. Particularly looking at timezone issues and generating a correct iCal file. On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Libby Miller wrote: > hi all, > > The next meeting is March 12th 2003, 17:00 UTC for 90 minutes > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=12&month=3&year=2003&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=0] > > on irc.freenode.net #rdfig > > all welcome. > > More agenda items to me as soon as possible please. If we can't fit them > in this time, we can add them to the next agenda. Agenda items could > include descriptions of problems or tools, as well as issues about the > RDF conversion of the iCalendar syntax. > > > Agenda so far > > 1. is it OK to check GPL'd code in under > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ ? > Libby Miller > > [[ > just to keep expectations modest... we can put > that on the agenda, but we can't really make decisions about it. > ]] > Dan Connolly, > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2003Feb/0012.html > > This was postponed last time; we may have to postpone again. > > [[ > 18:37:06 <libby> G:POSTPONED > ]] > on the grounds that DanC isn't sure he can contribute to GPLed software, > and it would be good to have all the code under a single license. At the > moment, the java code is GPLed because it depends on Daniel Resare's > GPLed parser. > > [[ > 18:26:48 <libby> I gues I could alk daniel if he feels like releaseing > his code as non GPL, no idea if he would say yes > ]] > > - daniel said no. > > > 2. How will we know when we're done? > Libby Miller > > Last week I asked Dan Connolly how long he thought this process (of > converting iCalendar to RDF) would take. He said he didn't know what the > criteria would be for finishing. I think this an interesting question > and I'd like to have a chat about it. > > > 3. Test data - where's the best place to get it from? > Libby Miller > > There is a great deal of iCalendar data out there, but most of it is > generated by apple's iCal program, which has some errors in the way it > exports to iCalendar. > > http://icalshare.com/ > > http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/mail-archive/msg04657.html thread, and > esp > http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/mail-archive/msg05069.html > (although apple say that they will fix this: > http://www.imc.org/ietf-calendar/mail-archive/msg05114.html) > > We also need complex and varied data to get good conversion tools. > > > Libby > > -- Ryan Lee ryanlee@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 16:52:32 UTC