W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > November 2001

RE: Logical mnemonic model

From: David King <david.king@commnav.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:56:40 -0500
To: "RDF Calendar List" <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OOENJEDPGBBFGIJGMGOJOEMPCAAA.david.king@commnav.com>
> In our migration from mime-directory to XML and RDF, it is
> important that we
> identify the incongruities discovered in the RFC2445 reoccurrence
> rules and
> make sure that we just don't pass these problems on unsolved.

Doesn't this mean that these incongruities need to be solved by the IETF
CALSCH working group first?  Would that happen in the near future?  If not,
would there be RDF-Calendar recurrence rules that are ever-so-slightly
different from RFC2445 recurrence rules?

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 09:55:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:46 UTC