- From: Charles F. Munat <chas@munat.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 23:57:11 -0700
- To: "Calendars" <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
I read through the IETF Internet Draft entitled "Guide to Internet Calendaring" -- http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-calsch-inetcal-guide-00.txt And if I read it correctly, there is (or shortly will be) a calendar management protocol (CAP) which: 1. Describes messages used to manage calendars (represented in ICAL). 2. Provides real-time binding for the calendar management messages. An alternative to the CAP transport mechanism is store-and-forward via email. It seems to me that a W3C equivalent might be to simply convert ICAL/etc. into CalML (if this hasn't already been done). Writing up a schema for CalML would probably be fairly easy. I'm not sure what the benefit would be to converting iCal to RDF instead of XML. Can anyone enlighten me? I mean, I can see some advantages to adding time, duration, period, sequence, etc. to RDF, but does it really need a full-fledged calendaring app? The more I look at this stuff, the more interesting it gets. Charles F. Munat Seattle, Washington
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2001 02:55:46 UTC