- From: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
- Date: 12 May 2001 10:45:13 -0500
- To: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
I didn't get a chance to reply to the original post, but my response to "Why do we need RDF calendering?" is that there is *great* benefit in having one style of data model for a large variety of applications (schemas) that, in particular, you can link and reference between them. In this sense it's not "reinventing" calendering or replacing iCalendar or others, so much as adapting them to the RDF model so it can be shared among other RDF applications. Groves also addressed this topic, although from a different angle. Grove "notation processors" were modules that took existing or external formats and translated them on-demand into the single data-model style (groves). For many applications, RDF processors could easily do the same thing rather than developing seperate schemas unique to RDF. -- Ken
Received on Saturday, 12 May 2001 11:46:18 UTC