- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:04:28 +0100
- To: "'Per Bothner'" <per@bothner.com>, "'Liam Quin'" <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-ql@w3.org>
You have to accept that it's intrinsically unlikely that a test suite produced by W3C, or by any other organization, will happen to be organized on the same lines as the one you have designed in-house. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ql-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ql-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Per Bothner > Sent: 14 August 2005 07:55 > To: Liam Quin > Cc: www-ql@w3.org > Subject: Re: early version of the XML Query Test Suite > > > Liam Quin wrote: > > So the test cases aren't written in the eXtreme or agile programming > > sense of identifying bugs, > > I'm sure you'd agree that a regression testsuite is essential for any > serious program development (at least of a programming langauge > implementation), not just "eXtreme or agile programming". > > > but rather to give coverage of the > > specification, and this different goal leads to a different > approach. > > Right. However, since implementors *will* need their own regression > test suites, it would make things easier if we could have a framework > for multiple purposes. Implementing and maintaining multiple testing > frameworks is possible (and probably not very difficult), but it does > add an extra management burden and needless complexity. > -- > --Per Bothner > per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/ > >
Received on Sunday, 14 August 2005 21:04:40 UTC