> > With a QName on the right, interpreting $a/xs:QName($b) to mean > $a/*[node-name()=xs:QName($b)] would make no sense at all in terms of "/" as > a mapping operator. Of course one could have overloaded the "/" operator > that way, but it would not have been a logical extension to the XPath 1.0 > meaning, and it would only create a shorter way of writing something that > can already be written with a predicate. > You are correct. I can now sleep in peace :)Received on Monday, 2 May 2005 08:21:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:44 UTC