- From: Michael Brundage <xquery@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:46:45 -0700
- To: Donald Spaeth <donald@spaeth.freeserve.co.uk>, Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>, "www-ql@w3.org 2" <www-ql@w3.org>
Hi Don, If you could point me to the passage you found misleading, that would be helpful. I recall stating that they are optional in XQuery implementations, but perhaps my memory has failed me. Thanks, Michael On 5/25/04 1:13 PM, "Donald Spaeth" <donald@spaeth.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: > Michael, > My source was Michael Brundage's new book on XQuery, pp. 68-69. However, I > had not appreciated the finer points of the distinction between XQuery 1.0 > and XPath 2.0, and XQuery was my main concern. In any case, I am glad to > learn that they aren't as gone as I had feared. Thanks to Jan for the > pointer to full-axis feature. > > Cheers, > Don > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com> > To: "Donald Spaeth" <donald@spaeth.freeserve.co.uk>; <> > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:19 PM > Subject: RE: Ancestors and siblings > > > XPath 2.0 still has them and for XQuery they have been added as optional > in the last call draft. Why do you think they are gone? > > Best regards > Michael > >
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2004 21:47:28 UTC