- From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:21:26 -0800
- To: Damien Fisher <damien@sodatech.com>
- Cc: www-ql@w3.org
Damien Fisher wrote: > And should rational answers always be returned exactly, even > if that requires an enormous amount of precision? Many language implementations (including any for full Common Lisp) do support exact rationals, and people seem to like that. (They also support floating-point.) In the Lisp family, exact rationals are usually implemented and printed as simplified fractions; but using repeating decimals might be more useful. E.g. op:numeric-divide(5, 3) could return a decimal whose literal form might be "1._6_" where digits between _ and _ are infinitely repeating. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2003 22:21:32 UTC