- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:00:55 -0800
- To: "Dimitris Karteris" <dkart@otenet.gr>, <www-ql@w3.org>
Thanks for the feedback. I think that GPE's can be added in a later version if enough people find them useful and implementors feel that they can be efficiently supported. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Dimitris Karteris [mailto:dkart@otenet.gr] > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:32 PM > To: Michael Rys; www-ql@w3.org > Subject: RE: general path expressions and XQuery > > Thank you for the information. At this point I would like to point out > that > in my opinion the lack of general path expression support as well as the > lack of wildcards on element and attribute matching are two important > disadvantages of XQuery. > > Dimitris Karteris > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Rys [mailto:mrys@microsoft.com] > > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:10 PM > > To: Dimitris Karteris; www-ql@w3.org > > Subject: RE: general path expressions and XQuery > > > > > > Since XQuery is using XPath as its path expression language, the answer > > is no. While some of the GPE's capabilities can be modeled with the > > alternation (|) (mainly | and ?) the * cannot be fully expressed in > > XPath 2.0 (some can be expressed with some of the axes or functions). > > > > Best regards > > Michael > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dimitris Karteris [mailto:dkart@otenet.gr] > > > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:30 AM > > > To: www-ql@w3.org > > > Subject: general path expressions and XQuery > > > > > > does XQuery support or plan to support the general path expressions > > > supported by Lorel? > > > >
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 16:01:27 UTC