W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2005

Re: answer to TAG comment on workflow

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 19:18:54 +0200
Message-ID: <22575059.20050503191854@w3.org>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org

On Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 5:16:06 PM, Karl wrote:

KD> Dear Chris,

KD> Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
KD> Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004

KD> After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will
KD> be considered as if you had accepted the comment.

KD> Original comment (issue 1144 [1]):
KD> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0000.html

KD> As a response to your comment where it was pointed out that the  
KD> specification was mixing workflow and specification editing, the QA
KD> Working Group has accepted your comment and decided to create a new
KD> section which is not mandatory : "Beyond Conformance."[2]

I think that makes the specification clearer and the conformance
proforma easier to complete.

KD> This section contains previous Good Practices which were workflow  
KD> related and that a WG might want to explore during the specification
KD> editing. Some of the good practices have been rewritten as well to  
KD> remove their workflow orientation when it was not necessary.

Thank you. Having reviewed the specification, it is now clearer.

KD> You might want to take a look at the table of changes[3] to not be lost.

KD> [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
KD> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1144
KD> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#beyond- 
KD> conformance
KD> [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2005/04/specgl-table.html

 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:19:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC