- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 19:18:54 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
On Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 5:16:06 PM, Karl wrote: KD> Dear Chris, KD> Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: KD> Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 KD> After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will KD> be considered as if you had accepted the comment. KD> Original comment (issue 1144 [1]): KD> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0000.html KD> As a response to your comment where it was pointed out that the KD> specification was mixing workflow and specification editing, the QA KD> Working Group has accepted your comment and decided to create a new KD> section which is not mandatory : "Beyond Conformance."[2] I think that makes the specification clearer and the conformance proforma easier to complete. KD> This section contains previous Good Practices which were workflow KD> related and that a WG might want to explore during the specification KD> editing. Some of the good practices have been rewritten as well to KD> remove their workflow orientation when it was not necessary. Thank you. Having reviewed the specification, it is now clearer. KD> You might want to take a look at the table of changes[3] to not be lost. KD> [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ KD> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1144 KD> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#beyond- KD> conformance KD> [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2005/04/specgl-table.html -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:19:16 UTC