- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:16:06 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Dear Chris, Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will be considered as if you had accepted the comment. Original comment (issue 1144 [1]): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0000.html As a response to your comment where it was pointed out that the specification was mixing workflow and specification editing, the QA Working Group has accepted your comment and decided to create a new section which is not mandatory : "Beyond Conformance."[2] This section contains previous Good Practices which were workflow related and that a WG might want to explore during the specification editing. Some of the good practices have been rewritten as well to remove their workflow orientation when it was not necessary. You might want to take a look at the table of changes[3] to not be lost. [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1144 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#beyond- conformance [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2005/04/specgl-table.html -- Karl Dubost QA Working Group Chair http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:16:40 UTC