- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 19:19:37 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
On Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 5:17:10 PM, Karl wrote: KD> Dear Chris, KD> Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: KD> Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 KD> After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will KD> be considered as if you had accepted the comment. KD> Original comment (issue 1156 [1]): KD> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0012.html KD> As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your KD> comment and has reworded [2]: KD> "QA Specification Guidelines: For editing each KD> Good Practice and Requirement of QA Specification KD> Guidelines, a template and a method were developed KD> to make the edition of each part easy to follow and KD> discuss by the QA Working Group and easy to incorporate KD> in the final document for the editor." KD> [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ KD> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1156 KD> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#practice- KD> principle Thank you. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:19:59 UTC