- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:03:05 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Dear Jeremy, Le 16 janv. 2004, à 11:00, Jeremy Carroll a écrit : > I would be satisfied if the QAWG decided that it was a mistake to > advance the three documents at different speeds and returned all > documents to Last Call when the Test Guidelines are ready, and when > all comments on all documents have been formally addressed. I'm not sure. You understant. It doesn't really matter we are going back to Last Call or Working Draft. I mean it will not delay the work we are doing. We are using the Process Document as a tool. The CR is a tool for us to seek for implementability, if we can't proove at the end of CR that we haven't enough implementations, we will go back to Last Call. There's no problem with that. The CR phase helps us to have a frozen state, which can be something that will show us that we are wrong or right. So what you suggest might happen, and it's perfectly fine. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 14:05:22 UTC