- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:00:27 +0000
- To: www-qa@w3.org
I formally object that issues raised on the Test GL by myself such as http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2003Jul/0001 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2003Jul/0004 were not added to the QAWG's issue list before the process of asking for advance of the Specification and Operational Guidelines to Candidate Recommendation. The rationale for this objection is that when advancing those two documents the QAWG gave a misleading impression that the related work of the whole QAF was stable. Moreover the splitting of the QAF into three recommendation track documents advancing at different speeds, were prejudicial against my timely comments on the Test Guidelines. Specifically the comment suggesting greater conversation between the QAWG and editors and WG's with Test recommendations and working drafts has been being acted on. The QAWG prevent my comment from having impact on issues which are not narrowly focussed on the test document, since the other issues are not part of 'stable' candidate recommendations. I would be satisfied if the QAWG decided that it was a mistake to advance the three documents at different speeds and returned all documents to Last Call when the Test Guidelines are ready, and when all comments on all documents have been formally addressed. Jeremy Carroll (personal comment, not on behalf of HP)
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 11:00:33 UTC