- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:06:26 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Le 16 janv. 2004, à 10:40, Jeremy Carroll a écrit : > I would be satisfied if the QAWG: > - found any other unaddressed comments on the Last Call documents > (such as Dan Connolly's) > - ascertained whether these commentators are satisfied or not > - asked the directors to consider any formal objections, including my > substantive objection (msg 0014). > - if the director upholds the WG resolutions, then to further draw the > objection(s) to the attention of the chairs list, the AC list and any > implementors of the CR documents. I can reply to all of that, but I'm not sure you will like the answers with pointers. I don't have time right now. But in short, - the OWL WG didn't reply to invitation to comment when done earlier - Comments were made 6 weeks after the closing date for reviews. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 14:06:28 UTC