.html? File Extensions Perhaps Not So Harmful from Sean B. Palmer on 2001-10-12 (www-qa@w3.org from October 2001)

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 02:06:03 +0100
To: <www-qa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <026501c152ba$3ca92fc0$b5d993c3@y0r1d9>

I've published a short article:-

   http://infomesh.net/2001/10/dothtml/

I'm just noodling on something TimBL wrote about ".html" file extenisons
being counter to persistence axioms. I'm not sure I can totally defend the
".html" position, and I still go to great lengths to avoid file
extensions... but enjoy the note anyway.

Cheers,

--
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
:Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .

Received on Thursday, 11 October 2001 21:06:53 UTC