- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:48:07 -0700
- To: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
I suspect that this is already done -- it is certainly intended. The single Framework document input to Brussels was split into a family four, more focused, parts. One of them deals with QA process and operational guidelines, and this is (at least) one place where the reference will appear. -Lofton. At 06:54 PM 12/5/01 +0100, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote: >Also, I would humbly ask that the DOM TS Process document >(http://www.w3.org/DOM/DOMTS-Process) and perhaps home page (which has >pointers to relevant resources, http://www.w3.org/DOM/Test) be put in the >reference section of the QA documentation, given that it has been >discussed on this list and also is quite broad in reach, sharing many >topics with QA. > >/Dimitris > >On Wednesday, December 5, 2001, at 06:19 PM, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote: > >>I have proposed to the DOM IG that the process document for the DOM TS be >>brought in sync with the activity in QA, where appropriate. I would like >>to, if possible, take this up with you tomorrow, time allowing, in order >>to present my ideas as well as common denominators between DOM TS and QA >>given the experiences from the now 9 month old development process. >> >>Also, I think that this framework can contribute greatly, perhaps serving >>as a primer or boilerplate, for any QA-Test activity launched (I believe >>I read something about this in the existing QA documentation). >> >>Best, >> >>/Dimitris >
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2001 18:47:02 UTC