- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:40:59 -0700
- To: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Dimitris, A natural place to discuss this would be during the discussion of the Framework documents. The second proposed Framework document, "Process & Operational Guidelines", is already attempting to distill generally applicable guidelines/checkpoints from DOM TS process (as well as other sources), and is using it as an example as well. At the least, it would be good to define tomorrow "the way forward" for this piece of the framework. (Btw, we expect that an outline/draft of the Procs&Ops document will be posted, at least a few hours before the meeting.) A boiler plate or template for process documents, in my opinion, is exactly the sort of tools and materials that QA should make available for the WGs. Regards, -Lofton. At 06:19 PM 12/5/01 +0100, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote: >I have proposed to the DOM IG that the process document for the DOM TS be >brought in sync with the activity in QA, where appropriate. I would like >to, if possible, take this up with you tomorrow, time allowing, in order >to present my ideas as well as common denominators between DOM TS and QA >given the experiences from the now 9 month old development process. > >Also, I think that this framework can contribute greatly, perhaps serving >as a primer or boilerplate, for any QA-Test activity launched (I believe I >read something about this in the existing QA documentation). > >Best, > >/Dimitris >
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2001 18:39:54 UTC