- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:36:55 -0400
- To: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Dom, thanks for the useful comments. Le 05-05-10 à 04:11, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : >> this is a first pass, > Wow, that was fast! If you consider 4 days of work, plus one long day yesterday from 1pm to 7pm without raising the nose is fast ;) So yes I agree. :p > Hmm... They're saying "is in conformance with", not "is conformant > to", > which I understand with a different meaning. Maybe they could use a > different wording to avoid this kind of problem, e.g. "It is believed > that this specification is in accordance with the Web Architecture > principles as described in AWWW". > > (FWIW, I still think it was a mistake for AWWW not to include a > conformance section, precisely for this reason...) It might be a mistake, but that's another problem ;) It's not here for now. Your suggestion is good. >> E. QA ICS >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/qa-ics.html >> >> Comment: Doesn't include the full ICS and new version of it. Not your >> mistake. >> > > Maybe you can elaborate a bit on this; you and I understand well > why so, > but probably not your readers :) Yes I will ;) >> >> QA WG has done it for you @@Link to the ICS@@ http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/05/svg-tiny-12-qa-ics.html One more thing done. It was faster ;) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2005 20:37:00 UTC