- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 08:37:37 -0600
- To: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
At 08:02 AM 5/10/2005 -0400, Lynne S. Rosenthal wrote: >Announcement looks good. >And, again Thanks to Patrick for a job well-done. +1. By the way, while looking up TestFAQ on the Library page [2], I noticed this: [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/Taxonomy.html [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/Library/#ref Should we (QAWG) have a look at it sometime and see if it still matches (or is consistent with) our view of the test/conformance landscape? Does it need updating, or is it fine as it stands? Should it somehow be integrated or referenced from other work? It seems sort of lonely and without context there. Cheers, -Lofton. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-qa-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-qa-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf > > Of Dominique Hazaël-Massieux > > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 4:53 AM > > To: www-qa-wg@w3.org > > Subject: Test FAQ ready to release, draft announcement to Chairs > > > > Hi QA WG, > > > > Patrick told me that the Test FAQ was ready to release at: > > http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/01/test-faq > > > > I've found the results really of high quality, so thanks to all the > > contributor for this, but in particular to Patrick whose hard work > > clearly shows here! > > > > I want to announce this to the Chairs mailing list, both to make it > > better known, and to request feedback and ideas for new questions. Here > > is a draft announcement, comments welcome before tomorrow morning my > > time, when I plan to send it. > > > > :<---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dear Chairs and Team Contacts, > > > > The QA Working Group has just released a first version of a Test > > Development FAQ, available at: > > http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/01/test-faq > > > > The 17 questions it addresses match the different topics the QA Working > > Group has found particularly important for most Working Groups in W3C > > and incorporate examples and ideas from various existing testing efforts > > in W3C. > > > > We think the current version of the document is already a useful tool > > for most Working Groups and hope you can help us advertise it among the > > participants of your own groups. The discussion on Test Suite > > development that was held during the Technical Plenary 2005 was a > > particular inspiration for this, and we believe it addresses at least > > partially some of the most important interrogations that this discussion > > raised. > > > > The QA Working Group is also greatly interested in getting feedback on > > the current answers proposed by this FAQ, as well as in getting new > > questions that the FAQ should cover. > > > > You can find this FAQ linked from the QA Library [1] and the W3C > > Guidebook [2]. > > > > Regards, > > > > For the QA Working Group, > > Dominique Hazael-Massieux, QA Activity Lead > > > > 1. http://www.w3.org/QA/Library/#ref > > 2. http://www.w3.org/Guide/#Deliverables > > :<-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I have already linked it from the W3C Guidebook [1] and the QA Library > > [2], and I plan to announce it in the QA news [3] and to www-qa after > > the Chairs announcement. > > > > Dom > > > > 1. http://www.w3.org/Guide/ > > 2. http://www.w3.org/QA/Library/#ref > > 3. http://www.w3.org/QA/#latest > > -- > > Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ > > W3C/ERCIM > > mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2005 14:37:52 UTC