Re: Issue 1049 (Formal vs prose language normativity) - suggested resolution from Dominique Hazaël-Massieux on 2005-05-10 (www-qa-wg@w3.org from May 2005)

From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:05:18 +0200
To: david_marston@us.ibm.com
Cc: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1115715919.5631.44.camel@stratustier>

Le lundi 09 mai 2005 à 14:08 -0400, david_marston@us.ibm.com a écrit :
> <draft> 
> The presence of such a statement will not relieve the specification
> developers of their obligation to resolve conflicts through the errata
> process required by the W3C Process Document. [link][4] 
> </draft> 

I would replace "will not" by "does not", but otherwise sounds good to
me.

Dom
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2005 09:05:26 UTC