- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:07:10 -0500
- To: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM>, QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1a8ce5b3cc73acb9771624279420fb73@w3.org>
Le 07 mars 2005, à 15:14, Patrick Curran a écrit :
> Either way, you will have to solicit and manage contributions from
> others. This can require a significant amount of organization and
> effort on your part if you are to get quality tests that cover the
> full range of the specification. Take the time to create a
> high-quality and informative 'appeal for contributions'.
Creating tests during the development of the specification will make
easier the Test Suite effort. It's a progressive way to go. Each time,
there's an idea for the specification developing a test for it will
gather set of tests that will be useful for the creation of your test
suite.
> Examples of style-sheets and test results publication (implementation
> reports)?
VoiceXML and RDF for examples.
http://www.w3.org/QA/TheMatrix has plenty of them in the last column.
> Examples of real test suites (containing docs, harness, etc.)?
SVG?
Though I have never seen a published test harness. I have seen with my
eyes, the one used by Vincent Hardy (Sun) on SVG and it was really
cool, but I don't know it if it's public.
> Example of good test suite documentation?
CSS Test Suite?
> Example of a WG encouraging/supporting publication of test results?
VoiceXML and SVG
> Example of a WG encouraging/supporting a certification or logo program
> ("this page validates....")?
VoiceXML would like to do that, I think. (to be confirmed)
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 04:46:13 UTC