- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:07:10 -0500
- To: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM>, QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1a8ce5b3cc73acb9771624279420fb73@w3.org>
Le 07 mars 2005, à 15:14, Patrick Curran a écrit : > Either way, you will have to solicit and manage contributions from > others. This can require a significant amount of organization and > effort on your part if you are to get quality tests that cover the > full range of the specification. Take the time to create a > high-quality and informative 'appeal for contributions'. Creating tests during the development of the specification will make easier the Test Suite effort. It's a progressive way to go. Each time, there's an idea for the specification developing a test for it will gather set of tests that will be useful for the creation of your test suite. > Examples of style-sheets and test results publication (implementation > reports)? VoiceXML and RDF for examples. http://www.w3.org/QA/TheMatrix has plenty of them in the last column. > Examples of real test suites (containing docs, harness, etc.)? SVG? Though I have never seen a published test harness. I have seen with my eyes, the one used by Vincent Hardy (Sun) on SVG and it was really cool, but I don't know it if it's public. > Example of good test suite documentation? CSS Test Suite? > Example of a WG encouraging/supporting publication of test results? VoiceXML and SVG > Example of a WG encouraging/supporting a certification or logo program > ("this page validates....")? VoiceXML would like to do that, I think. (to be confirmed) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 04:46:13 UTC