- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:07:32 +0100
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1110290852.11665.238.camel@stratustier>
Bug 1057 [1] (that I classified as editorial and thus we didn't discuss during the F2F) makes several editorial suggestions for the introductory paragraphs of "Specifying conformance", which I thought were all good and thus implemented in the document. The next text [2] reads: 1. Specifying Conformance Conformance is the fulfillment of a product, process, or service of specified requirements. These requirements are detailed in a specification as part of a conformance clause and in the body of the specification. A conformance clause is a section of a specification that identifies all the criteria that must be satisfied in order to claim conformance to the specification. A clear presentation of conformance is crucial to successful interoperability of implementations. The conformance model and the language used for normative information determine the testability of a specification. They also influence the overall implementation landscape, ranging from a narrow conformance with few allowable variations in implementations to multiple conformance types, resulting in numerous conforming implementations. The model must be chosen carefully, to produce the intended implementation range Comments welcome (I suggest this gets added to batch approval resolution for next week otherwise). Dom 1. http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1057 2. http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#specifying-conformance -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 14:07:34 UTC